• Home
    • Gender-based Justice:
      An Overview
      • Strengthened Practice through Collaboration
      • Our Approach
      • Gender-based Violence in Southern Africa
    • Partners
    • Resources
      • CSA&G Monographs and Publications
      • Opinion Pieces
      • Academic Articles
      • Boutique Requests
      • Research Reports
      • Seminars and webinars
    • Content Contributors
    • Partner Forum
    • Links
    • Contact
    Moen Seminar
    Gender, HIV and Sexualities Seminar: February
    15th February 2018
    aids-review-unreal
    Kometsi, K. 2004. (Un)Real. AIDS Review 2004. Series Editor: Crewe, M.
    20th February 2018
    Published by Gender Justice at 20th February 2018
    Categories
    • Future Events
    Tags
    • masculinities
    • seminar

    Whose wounds matter?  An appraisal of current discourse on the movie Inxeba (the Wound)

    by Lubabalo Mdedetyana, Centre for Sexualities, AIDS and Gender, UP

    Mdedetyana SeminarDate: 20 March 2018
    Time: 14:30 – 16:00
    Venue: Graduate Centre L1-68
    RSVP: nombongo.shenxane@up.ac.za
    (please RSVP to secure a seat)
    20/03/2018

    This paper explores the controversies that followed the recent release of the award-winning film, Inxeba (the Wound) in South Africa. Inxeba explores the practice of ulwaluko, the Xhosa spiritual initiation rite of passage to manhood (Qekema, 2017). In this context the film grapples with the challenges faced by men attracted to men in an environment that silences and oppresses same-sex desires and intimate sexual relations between men.

    The controversies around the film span a broad spectrum. On the one end are members of the Congress of Traditional Leaders (Contralesa) and its supporters (mostly Xhosa speaking men and women), who are of the view that the film violates the sacred Xhosa culture of ulwaluko. On the other end are people who hold the view that the film should not be seen as affronting ulwaluko culture (Ntshwanti, 2017). Other contentious views accuse the film of cultural appropriation because its director is a white male and a cultural outsider to ulwaluko (Xaso & Pikoli, 2017; Qekema, 2017). Another view advocates for the respect of the rights of the artist to be free to produce art (McKaizer, 2018). To critically appraise these discussions, I draw from my own first-hand knowledge and experience with the ritual. I proceed by arguing that though there are justifiable concerns about cultural (mis)appropriation and its potential insidious effects, art should still be given room to find its own voice and expression.

    Share
    Gender Justice
    Gender Justice

    Related posts

    3rd May 2018

    Gender, HIV and Sexualities Seminar: May


    Read more

    About the CSA&G

    The Centre for Sexualities, AIDS and Gender at the University of Pretoria strives to imagine and realise a world where everyone is valued. Through research, advocacy and community work it examines the role of power relations and their impact on all sectors of society.

    Disclaimer

    The views and opinions expressed on this website reflect those of the CSA&G and unless explicitly stated, do not reflect those of its donors, partners or the University of Pretoria.

    Contact Centre

    © 2019, Centre for Sexualities, AIDS and Gender | University of Pretoria